Download the September 2018 Postal Update
Postal Service leaders have publicly stated that they are preparing a CPI-based rate increase for January 2019, based on August CPI. Now that there are two board members, we expect the Postal Service to move forward with the CPI-based rate filing. Most mailers are planning on an increase of 2 – 3% in January or February with an additional increase later in the year of 2 – 3% in anticipation that the PRC will move forward with a variation of their original 10-Year Rate Review findings. Actual rates will vary. For example, expect drop-shipped Marketing Mail letters to go up much more than inflation for the third consecutive year. This is due to the USPS finding that it has been overly generous in passing through its cost-savings to the mailers who do the work-sharing.
Postal Reform and the PRC 10-Year Rate Review continue to remain on hold. In an evening session on August 28, 2018, the United States Senate confirmed both nominees for the USPS Board of Governors:
Also on August 28, President Donald J. Trump announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to BOG:
Friday, August 10, marked the 120-day deadline for the Task Force on the United States Postal System report to be completed. Over the last months, many industry associations have met with the Task Force. Indications are that President Trump was briefed but there has been no public statement on if the report will be released, only conflicting guesses.
There are other legal and legislative activities that have the potential to impact marketers and mail volumes. Supreme Court Rules against Wayfair in Online Sales Tax Battle: June 21, in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of South Dakota on South Dakota vs Wayfair. South Dakota was seeking to upend the 1992 Quill ruling which prevented states from imposing sales taxes on companies that did not maintain a physical presence within their borders. California Consumer Privacy Act: At the end of June, California passed sweeping new privacy and data security legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act. The act is similar in nature to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a regulation in EU law on data protection and privacy for all individuals within the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA). Expansion to other states may limit marketers reach and ability to target.
We anticipate that the Postal Service will seek a rate increase for January 2019. Over the summer, USPS leaders publicly stated that they were preparing a CPI-based rate increase for early 2019. The barrier to filing was the lack of board to approve a rate increase. The cycle of filing in October, based on August CPI, with a January implementation, has become the typical timeline over the last years. As a point of reference, CPI in March was 2.051%, 2.073% in April, increased by .2% in May and June CPI came in at 2.254%. Note that the rating authority is not necessarily applied as a flat charge across rate cells, instead, some rates may be greater than CPI and others lower. Actual rates will vary. For example, expect drop-shipped Marketing Mail letters to go up much more than inflation for the third consecutive year. This is due to the USPS finding that it has been overly generous in passing through its cost-savings to the mailers who do the work-sharing.
Friday, August 10, marked the 120-day deadline for the Task Force on the United States Postal System report to be completed. Over the last months, many industry associations have met with the Task Force. Indications are that President Trump was briefed but there has been no public statement on if the report will be released.
The White House has released their Reform Plan and Reorganization Recommendations for Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century. This Reform Plan is an annual report that started based on an Executive Order (EO) 13781, entitled “Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch”. It highlights the need to evaluate the organizational constructs that support today’s mission delivery objectives. Building on a history of bipartisan Government reform initiatives, the EO focuses specifically on the role of organizational alignment in reducing “duplication and redundancy,” and improving “efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of the executive branch.” The report outlines the Administration’s analysis and recommendations for structural realignment of the Executive Branch to better serve the mission, service, and stewardship needs of the American people. While some of the recommendations identified in this volume can be achieved via Executive administrative action, more significant changes will require legislative action as well. The section on changes to the United States Postal Service begins on page 68 and contains the following: United States Postal Service: Summary of Proposal: This proposal would restructure the United States Postal System to return it to a sustainable business model or prepare it for future conversion from a Government agency into a privately-held corporation. Like many European nations, the United States could privatize its postal operator while maintaining strong regulatory oversight to ensure fair competition and reasonable prices for customers. The President’s Task Force on the United States Postal System will make recommendations on reforms towards this goal in August 2018. Again, the report is a group of recommendations that are based on the Administration’s analysis. Recommendations that are significant in nature typically require legislative action. The chances of seeing a privatized Postal Service in the near future are extremely low.
The industry remains in a holding pattern. More than 150 organizations submitted PRC 10-Year Review Comments. Following the comment period, a reply comment period was opened with an end date of March 30, 2018. The timeline for a final ruling is unknown. Once final, there is an anticipated 45 – 90 day implementation period. This is a very fluid situation. Some thought it could be as early as June 2018 or push into 2019. The White House Task Force and lack of BOG have been pointed to as the reason for the PRC’s delay in moving forward.
Most expected that the legislation is likely to hold until the completion of the Task Force. Now that the report has been delivered to the White House, but not publically released, uncertainty continues.
On June 12, the United States House of Representatives has reintroduced the postal reform bill it first introduced early last year. It is called the Postal Reform Act of 2018. The bill's new number is HR 6076 and can be found here. Watch for updates at CONGRESS.GOV. It was introduced by Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC-11th) and cosponsored by Reps. Steve Russell (R-OK-6th), Dennis Ross (R-FL-15th), Elijah Cummings (D-MD-7th), Gerry Connolly (D-VA-11th), and Stephen Lynch (D-MA-8th). The bill requires the USPS to come up with a plan to manage its debt, taking into account "projected changes in mail volume, projected changes in the number of employees needed to carry out the responsibilities of the Postal Service, the long-term capital needs of the Postal Service, including the need to maintain, repair and replace facilities and equipment and the distinctions between market-dominant and competitive products." The goal is to stabilize the USPS as an integral part of domestic and international supply chains.
This has a low chance of moving forward, but if it did, it would mean additional costs to the USPS and decreased the ability to lower costs. On June 18, Jose Serrano (D-NY), Evan Jenkins (R-WV), and Gwen Moore (D-WI) have reintroduced the Stop Postal Closures Act (H.R. 6282), bipartisan legislation to end the closure and consolidations of mail processing facilities across the country. (The bill was introduced during the previous session of Congress as H.R. 4656.) In 2012, the U.S. Postal Service began closing or consolidating mail processing plants across the country, including two facilities in Eureka and Petaluma. Mail processing plants are the central sorting hubs, and their elimination can mean that mail has to travel farther before delivery. Facility closures have been associated with delays in mail delivery, missed overnight mail deadlines, and reduced frequency of deliveries. These closures are particularly taxing on seniors, veterans and rural communities who depend on timely deliveries for prescriptions and other services. While the USPS temporarily has halted these closures, they could begin again at any time…. Specifically, the legislation would:
Sponsor: Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8] (Introduced 07/16/2018) Committees: House - Oversight and Government Reform Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should take all appropriate measures to ensure that the United States Postal Service remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government and is not subject to privatization. Sense is that this is union driven and will not make it to the floor.
In an evening session on August 28, 2018, the United States Senate confirmed both nominees for the USPS Board of Governors:
Also on August 28, President Donald J. Trump announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to BOG:
The term of the last Governor expired on December 8, 2016. By law, the USPS must notify the PRC of any changes to rates, fees or basic classification rules. Such filings require the prior approval of the Postal Service’s Board of Governors. The Board normally consists of up to nine governors appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate. Currently, the Board of Governors now consists of only the Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General. With no politically appointed members, they do not have the authority to approve rate changes or basic classification changes; this includes promotions.
Michael Kubayanda has been under consideration to fill the vacant Postal Regulatory Commissioner position. On June 6, 2018, the President formally nominated Mr. Kubayanda to fill that position for the remainder of a six-year term expiring November 22, 2020. Mr. Kubayanda serves as a board member and privacy officer for a digital health startup. Michael previously worked with the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Postal Service, ending as director of government relations, in which he worked with OIG officials to support the work of inspectors general in data analytics. In the OIG’s research group, he oversaw research on technical issues and wrote reports addressing postal economics and price regulation, intellectual property, and public-private partnerships, while serving as an advisor to colleagues on issues such as privacy, knowledge management, and innovation. Prior to the OIG, he served on the staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Michael holds degrees from Georgetown University, Northwestern University, The Ohio State University, and studied at the Graduate Institute in Geneva, Switzerland. Background: The Commission is composed of five Commissioners. They are appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, for a term of six years. Not more than 3 of the Commissioners may be adherents of the same political party.
| Current Commissioners | Term Expiration Date |
| Chairman Robert G. Taub (R) | Oct. 14, 2022 |
| Vice Chairman Tony Hammond (R) | Oct. 14, 2018 |
| Commissioner Mark Acton (R) | Oct. 14, 2022 |
| Commissioner Nanci E. Langley (D) | Nov. 22, 2018 |
| Vacant | Nov. 22, 2020 |
The Postal Service has been developing a new Enterprise Payment System (EPS) to replace the current product-centric payment with a centralized account processing system enabling customers to pay and manage their service online using a single account. The Enterprise Payment System (EPS) allows customers to pay for Postal products and services through a single account, called the Enterprise Payment Account (EPA). EPS supports commercial, domestic and international products and services which includes First-Class Mail, USPS Marketing Mail, Periodicals, Electronic PO Boxes Online (EPOBOL) and Address Quality Products. USPS representatives are reaching out to mailers to help them through the upgrade process. For CAPS users, the Postal Service has announced the retirement of CAPS on April 1, 2019.
The Postal Service reported its financial results on August 9 for the third quarter of 2018 (April 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018). It was a reported loss of $1.5 billion, compared with a $2.1 billion dollar loss during the third quarter of 2017. There was a modest increase in revenue from price increases and growth in the USPS shipping business as well as reductions in retiree benefit expenses contributed to the improvement. The multi-year trends of declining volumes of letter mail and growth in packages continued this quarter.
In September, it was announced that the USPS would not make their mandatory payments into accounts for its retirees’ pensions and health care. From 2012 through 2017 these missed payments add up to nearly $34 billion.
Postal Regulatory Commission issued a ruling in PI2015-1 that grants the Postal Service's petition to use internal measurement systems to measure service performance on its products. This will replace the External First-Class (EXFC) measurement system used to measure delivery performance. The internal measurement system includes a greater volume of mail than the sampling method. It was on January 29, 2015, that the Commission established Docket No. PI2015-1 to consider a Postal Service proposal concerning new internal service performance measurement systems for several of its market-dominant products, including products within domestic First-Class Mail, Periodicals, Marketing Mail and Package Services. Over the duration of this docket, the Postal Service has progressed from presenting an “idea” for new measurement systems to developing and implementing systems that report service performance for a variety of market dominant products. Over that time, the Postal Service proceeded with the development and implementation of these new measurement systems for its own internal purposes. The Postal Service did not base its proposals on costs. However, the increase in costs due to implementing and operating the internal service performance measurement system will be offset by the retirement of the legacy EXFC measurement system. This includes the EXFC end-to-end measurement system applicable to First-Class Mail, single-piece letters and flats. It also includes the use of EXFC reporters for generating Last Mile data for other mail products. In the docket, the Postal Service asks the Commission to consider whether or not the Commission would accept data generated by these systems for the purpose of service performance measurement reporting as required by regulation and statute. 39 U.S.C. § 3652 requires that the Postal Service provide an annual report to the Commission analyzing the quality of service “for each market-dominant product provided in such year” by providing “(B) measures of the quality of service afforded by the Postal Service in connection with such product, including— (i) the level of service (described in terms of speed of delivery and reliability) provided; and (ii) the degree of customer satisfaction with the service provided.”
On April 17 a hearing took place before the U.S. Supreme Court. The court is considering whether to overrule Quill, a 1992 decision that the Constitution’s commerce clause prohibits the states from requiring out-of-state retailers that do not have a physical presence in the state to collect tax on sales to state residents. At that time, sources projections on pending ruling seemed mixed. The American Catalog Mailers Association, ACMA stated “we have a reason for cautious optimism” and that “the Justices clearly understand what is at stake for the industry and they are wrestling with the appropriate result.” Finally on June 21, in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of South Dakota on South Dakota vs Wayfair. South Dakota was seeking to upend the 1992 Quill ruling which prevented states from imposing sales taxes on companies that did not maintain a physical presence within their borders. Consequently, catalog shippers and others may now be required to collect tax on shipments irrespective of where they are located physically. As the United State has a number of different local and tax regimes, this ruling could have important cost implications for catalog mailers. The following was provided by the American Catalog Mailers Association provided the following information that provides additional insight into the fact that it is not about avoiding tax, but rather the complexity of its management: “Small catalog and online retailers with little or no presence beyond their headquarters will be hurt the most – some will be forced out of business,” said ACMA President & Executive Director Hamilton Davison. “Rural Americans, shut-ins and older consumers will be particularly hard hit by this decision.” By ruling against remote sellers and customers all across America, the High Court’s decision means companies who sell only 100 orders a year must now collect sales taxes for every South Dakota order. “This is a ridiculously small threshold,” Davison said. “A merchant might sell only 100 $20 orders and now be forced to comply with laws well outside its capacity and be subject to horrendous complexity.” This opens the door to more than 12,000 separate taxing jurisdictions who are now free to impose virtually any requirement on businesses nationwide. Gone too are the protections from unreasonable and countless compliance burdens on companies without a physical presence; in fact, there may be no end to what politicos attempt to impose on those who do not vote for them. “The dizzying array of differing state and local tax laws presents an impossible array of complexity for both remote sellers like catalog companies and their customers,” Davison added. Congress must now work quickly to clarify exactly what burdens are acceptable to interstate commerce before things devolve into chaos unleashed by this decision. “Given the lack of restraint historically shown by regulators and tax administrators willing to impose virtually any burden on companies outside their borders,” Davison said, “the Court’s decision is sobering and troubling.” Adding to the absurdity of the High Court’s decision, a recent Government Accounting Office report found that forcing all remote sellers to collect sales tax adds only 2%-3% new revenue but would impose significant additional costs to collect. In essence, it will take only a small drop to employment and corporate profitability to offset any new sales tax revenues this generates.
The below information was provided by the Association of National Advertisers, ANA. Expansions of these efforts could impact Marketing Mail volumes. At the end of June, California passed sweeping new privacy and data security legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act (AB375). The bill passed in lieu of a ballot initiative that was being readied for the November ballot. While marginally better than the ballot initiative, the legislation also contains a number of problematic and unclear provisions: